Files
stonks-oracle/services/intelligence_pipeline_v3/adjudication/schemas.py
T
Celes Renata a72f336ad1 feat: Intelligence Pipeline v3 — full implementation
Multi-stage evidence-grounded inference architecture replacing the
monolithic 9B model extraction pipeline. CPU-first specialist services
handle routine extraction while the 9B vLLM model is preserved for
semantic adjudication of ambiguous cases.

Key components:
- Capability-aware inference gateway (OpenAI-compatible + Ollama)
- Endpoint registry with DB migrations and REST API
- Sentence-aware document segmenter (property tests)
- Deterministic financial parsing with offset integrity
- Symbol resolution with ambiguity detection
- Specialist service (GLiNER2, dynamic batching, K8s deployment)
- Company-specific sentiment (FinBERT, calibration)
- Retrieval-based novelty and duplicate detection
- Confidence calibration pipeline
- Deterministic routing engine (property tests)
- 9B adjudication layer with VRAM gating
- Stock-specific impact model (features, labels, baseline, trained)
- Pipeline orchestrator (state machine, queues, leases, feature flags)
- Bounded parallelism (async workers, semaphore, load shedding)
- Observability (tracing, metrics, alerts)
- Compatibility adapter (v3→v2 golden mapping tests)
- Shadow/canary promotion framework
- Active learning and fine-tuning pipeline

Test results: 1,161 tests pass, ruff lint clean.
All 282 spec tasks completed.
2026-07-13 02:14:59 +00:00

179 lines
6.2 KiB
Python

"""Adjudication schemas for Intelligence Pipeline v3.
Defines Pydantic models for the adjudication layer:
- AdjudicationCandidate: a proposed entity/fact/event requiring adjudication
- ConflictDescription: describes a conflict between candidates
- AdjudicationQuestion: a specific question the adjudicator must resolve
- EvidencePacket: evidence spans provided to the adjudicator
- AdjudicationDecision: the adjudicator's resolution (excludes confidence,
novelty, impact, and horizon — those come from calibrated pipelines)
Every decision requires evidence_ids linking back to packet evidence.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from enum import Enum
from typing import Any
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
class CandidateType(str, Enum):
"""Type of candidate being adjudicated."""
ENTITY = "entity"
EVENT = "event"
FACT = "fact"
RELATION = "relation"
SENTIMENT = "sentiment"
class AdjudicationCandidate(BaseModel):
"""A proposed extraction candidate that requires adjudication.
Represents an entity, event, fact, relation, or sentiment that the
fast-path could not resolve with sufficient confidence.
"""
candidate_id: str = Field(description="Unique identifier for this candidate")
candidate_type: CandidateType = Field(description="Type of candidate")
label: str = Field(description="Human-readable label or description")
source_chunk_ids: list[str] = Field(
default_factory=list,
description="Chunk IDs where this candidate was found",
)
evidence_ids: list[str] = Field(
default_factory=list,
description="Evidence span IDs supporting this candidate",
)
metadata: dict[str, Any] = Field(
default_factory=dict,
description="Additional type-specific metadata",
)
score: float = Field(
default=0.0,
ge=0.0,
le=1.0,
description="Specialist extraction score (0.0-1.0)",
)
class ConflictType(str, Enum):
"""Type of conflict between candidates."""
CONTRADICTORY_VALUES = "contradictory_values"
AMBIGUOUS_IDENTITY = "ambiguous_identity"
OPPOSING_SENTIMENT = "opposing_sentiment"
OVERLAPPING_EVENTS = "overlapping_events"
CAUSAL_AMBIGUITY = "causal_ambiguity"
class ConflictDescription(BaseModel):
"""Describes a conflict between two or more candidates.
Used to inform the adjudicator about what needs resolution.
"""
conflict_id: str = Field(description="Unique identifier for this conflict")
conflict_type: ConflictType = Field(description="Type of conflict")
candidate_ids: list[str] = Field(
min_length=2,
description="IDs of conflicting candidates",
)
description: str = Field(description="Human-readable conflict description")
evidence_ids: list[str] = Field(
default_factory=list,
description="Evidence IDs relevant to this conflict",
)
class QuestionCode(str, Enum):
"""Codes representing specific adjudication questions."""
RESOLVE_ENTITY_IDENTITY = "RESOLVE_ENTITY_IDENTITY"
RESOLVE_EVENT_TYPE = "RESOLVE_EVENT_TYPE"
RESOLVE_CAUSAL_DIRECTION = "RESOLVE_CAUSAL_DIRECTION"
RESOLVE_NUMERIC_CONFLICT = "RESOLVE_NUMERIC_CONFLICT"
RESOLVE_SENTIMENT_DIRECTION = "RESOLVE_SENTIMENT_DIRECTION"
RESOLVE_TEMPORAL_ORDERING = "RESOLVE_TEMPORAL_ORDERING"
RESOLVE_COMPANY_ATTRIBUTION = "RESOLVE_COMPANY_ATTRIBUTION"
CONFIRM_CROSS_CHUNK_RELATION = "CONFIRM_CROSS_CHUNK_RELATION"
class AdjudicationQuestion(BaseModel):
"""A specific question the adjudicator must answer.
Each question references candidates and conflicts that need resolution.
"""
question_code: QuestionCode = Field(description="Structured question code")
description: str = Field(description="Natural language question for the adjudicator")
candidate_ids: list[str] = Field(
default_factory=list,
description="Candidate IDs this question applies to",
)
conflict_ids: list[str] = Field(
default_factory=list,
description="Conflict IDs this question resolves",
)
class EvidencePacket(BaseModel):
"""Evidence spans provided to the adjudicator.
Contains the exact text and location of evidence the adjudicator
can reference in its decisions.
"""
evidence_id: str = Field(description="Unique identifier for this evidence span")
chunk_id: str = Field(description="Source chunk identifier")
start_char: int = Field(ge=0, description="Start character offset within chunk")
end_char: int = Field(gt=0, description="End character offset within chunk")
text: str = Field(min_length=1, description="Evidence text content")
source_document_id: str = Field(description="Parent document identifier")
class DecisionVerdict(str, Enum):
"""Possible verdicts for an adjudication decision."""
ACCEPT = "accept"
REJECT = "reject"
MERGE = "merge"
SPLIT = "split"
REATTRIBUTE = "reattribute"
class AdjudicationDecision(BaseModel):
"""The adjudicator's resolution for one or more candidates.
IMPORTANT: This model intentionally EXCLUDES:
- authoritative confidence (comes from calibration pipeline)
- novelty (comes from retrieval-based novelty stage)
- impact (comes from stock-specific impact model)
- horizon (comes from impact model)
The adjudicator resolves candidate identity, relationships, event
interpretation, and supported qualitative direction only. Every
decision MUST reference evidence_ids from the provided packet.
"""
decision_id: str = Field(description="Unique identifier for this decision")
question_code: QuestionCode = Field(description="Which question this resolves")
verdict: DecisionVerdict = Field(description="The adjudication verdict")
candidate_ids: list[str] = Field(
min_length=1,
description="Candidate IDs this decision applies to",
)
evidence_ids: list[str] = Field(
min_length=1,
description="Evidence IDs supporting this decision (required, non-empty)",
)
reasoning: str = Field(
description="Brief reasoning for the decision",
)
resolved_value: dict[str, Any] = Field(
default_factory=dict,
description="The resolved value(s) if applicable",
)