Multi-stage evidence-grounded inference architecture replacing the monolithic 9B model extraction pipeline. CPU-first specialist services handle routine extraction while the 9B vLLM model is preserved for semantic adjudication of ambiguous cases. Key components: - Capability-aware inference gateway (OpenAI-compatible + Ollama) - Endpoint registry with DB migrations and REST API - Sentence-aware document segmenter (property tests) - Deterministic financial parsing with offset integrity - Symbol resolution with ambiguity detection - Specialist service (GLiNER2, dynamic batching, K8s deployment) - Company-specific sentiment (FinBERT, calibration) - Retrieval-based novelty and duplicate detection - Confidence calibration pipeline - Deterministic routing engine (property tests) - 9B adjudication layer with VRAM gating - Stock-specific impact model (features, labels, baseline, trained) - Pipeline orchestrator (state machine, queues, leases, feature flags) - Bounded parallelism (async workers, semaphore, load shedding) - Observability (tracing, metrics, alerts) - Compatibility adapter (v3→v2 golden mapping tests) - Shadow/canary promotion framework - Active learning and fine-tuning pipeline Test results: 1,161 tests pass, ruff lint clean. All 282 spec tasks completed.
179 lines
6.2 KiB
Python
179 lines
6.2 KiB
Python
"""Adjudication schemas for Intelligence Pipeline v3.
|
|
|
|
Defines Pydantic models for the adjudication layer:
|
|
- AdjudicationCandidate: a proposed entity/fact/event requiring adjudication
|
|
- ConflictDescription: describes a conflict between candidates
|
|
- AdjudicationQuestion: a specific question the adjudicator must resolve
|
|
- EvidencePacket: evidence spans provided to the adjudicator
|
|
- AdjudicationDecision: the adjudicator's resolution (excludes confidence,
|
|
novelty, impact, and horizon — those come from calibrated pipelines)
|
|
|
|
Every decision requires evidence_ids linking back to packet evidence.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from enum import Enum
|
|
from typing import Any
|
|
|
|
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
|
|
|
|
|
|
class CandidateType(str, Enum):
|
|
"""Type of candidate being adjudicated."""
|
|
|
|
ENTITY = "entity"
|
|
EVENT = "event"
|
|
FACT = "fact"
|
|
RELATION = "relation"
|
|
SENTIMENT = "sentiment"
|
|
|
|
|
|
class AdjudicationCandidate(BaseModel):
|
|
"""A proposed extraction candidate that requires adjudication.
|
|
|
|
Represents an entity, event, fact, relation, or sentiment that the
|
|
fast-path could not resolve with sufficient confidence.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
candidate_id: str = Field(description="Unique identifier for this candidate")
|
|
candidate_type: CandidateType = Field(description="Type of candidate")
|
|
label: str = Field(description="Human-readable label or description")
|
|
source_chunk_ids: list[str] = Field(
|
|
default_factory=list,
|
|
description="Chunk IDs where this candidate was found",
|
|
)
|
|
evidence_ids: list[str] = Field(
|
|
default_factory=list,
|
|
description="Evidence span IDs supporting this candidate",
|
|
)
|
|
metadata: dict[str, Any] = Field(
|
|
default_factory=dict,
|
|
description="Additional type-specific metadata",
|
|
)
|
|
score: float = Field(
|
|
default=0.0,
|
|
ge=0.0,
|
|
le=1.0,
|
|
description="Specialist extraction score (0.0-1.0)",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ConflictType(str, Enum):
|
|
"""Type of conflict between candidates."""
|
|
|
|
CONTRADICTORY_VALUES = "contradictory_values"
|
|
AMBIGUOUS_IDENTITY = "ambiguous_identity"
|
|
OPPOSING_SENTIMENT = "opposing_sentiment"
|
|
OVERLAPPING_EVENTS = "overlapping_events"
|
|
CAUSAL_AMBIGUITY = "causal_ambiguity"
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ConflictDescription(BaseModel):
|
|
"""Describes a conflict between two or more candidates.
|
|
|
|
Used to inform the adjudicator about what needs resolution.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
conflict_id: str = Field(description="Unique identifier for this conflict")
|
|
conflict_type: ConflictType = Field(description="Type of conflict")
|
|
candidate_ids: list[str] = Field(
|
|
min_length=2,
|
|
description="IDs of conflicting candidates",
|
|
)
|
|
description: str = Field(description="Human-readable conflict description")
|
|
evidence_ids: list[str] = Field(
|
|
default_factory=list,
|
|
description="Evidence IDs relevant to this conflict",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class QuestionCode(str, Enum):
|
|
"""Codes representing specific adjudication questions."""
|
|
|
|
RESOLVE_ENTITY_IDENTITY = "RESOLVE_ENTITY_IDENTITY"
|
|
RESOLVE_EVENT_TYPE = "RESOLVE_EVENT_TYPE"
|
|
RESOLVE_CAUSAL_DIRECTION = "RESOLVE_CAUSAL_DIRECTION"
|
|
RESOLVE_NUMERIC_CONFLICT = "RESOLVE_NUMERIC_CONFLICT"
|
|
RESOLVE_SENTIMENT_DIRECTION = "RESOLVE_SENTIMENT_DIRECTION"
|
|
RESOLVE_TEMPORAL_ORDERING = "RESOLVE_TEMPORAL_ORDERING"
|
|
RESOLVE_COMPANY_ATTRIBUTION = "RESOLVE_COMPANY_ATTRIBUTION"
|
|
CONFIRM_CROSS_CHUNK_RELATION = "CONFIRM_CROSS_CHUNK_RELATION"
|
|
|
|
|
|
class AdjudicationQuestion(BaseModel):
|
|
"""A specific question the adjudicator must answer.
|
|
|
|
Each question references candidates and conflicts that need resolution.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
question_code: QuestionCode = Field(description="Structured question code")
|
|
description: str = Field(description="Natural language question for the adjudicator")
|
|
candidate_ids: list[str] = Field(
|
|
default_factory=list,
|
|
description="Candidate IDs this question applies to",
|
|
)
|
|
conflict_ids: list[str] = Field(
|
|
default_factory=list,
|
|
description="Conflict IDs this question resolves",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class EvidencePacket(BaseModel):
|
|
"""Evidence spans provided to the adjudicator.
|
|
|
|
Contains the exact text and location of evidence the adjudicator
|
|
can reference in its decisions.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
evidence_id: str = Field(description="Unique identifier for this evidence span")
|
|
chunk_id: str = Field(description="Source chunk identifier")
|
|
start_char: int = Field(ge=0, description="Start character offset within chunk")
|
|
end_char: int = Field(gt=0, description="End character offset within chunk")
|
|
text: str = Field(min_length=1, description="Evidence text content")
|
|
source_document_id: str = Field(description="Parent document identifier")
|
|
|
|
|
|
class DecisionVerdict(str, Enum):
|
|
"""Possible verdicts for an adjudication decision."""
|
|
|
|
ACCEPT = "accept"
|
|
REJECT = "reject"
|
|
MERGE = "merge"
|
|
SPLIT = "split"
|
|
REATTRIBUTE = "reattribute"
|
|
|
|
|
|
class AdjudicationDecision(BaseModel):
|
|
"""The adjudicator's resolution for one or more candidates.
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: This model intentionally EXCLUDES:
|
|
- authoritative confidence (comes from calibration pipeline)
|
|
- novelty (comes from retrieval-based novelty stage)
|
|
- impact (comes from stock-specific impact model)
|
|
- horizon (comes from impact model)
|
|
|
|
The adjudicator resolves candidate identity, relationships, event
|
|
interpretation, and supported qualitative direction only. Every
|
|
decision MUST reference evidence_ids from the provided packet.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
decision_id: str = Field(description="Unique identifier for this decision")
|
|
question_code: QuestionCode = Field(description="Which question this resolves")
|
|
verdict: DecisionVerdict = Field(description="The adjudication verdict")
|
|
candidate_ids: list[str] = Field(
|
|
min_length=1,
|
|
description="Candidate IDs this decision applies to",
|
|
)
|
|
evidence_ids: list[str] = Field(
|
|
min_length=1,
|
|
description="Evidence IDs supporting this decision (required, non-empty)",
|
|
)
|
|
reasoning: str = Field(
|
|
description="Brief reasoning for the decision",
|
|
)
|
|
resolved_value: dict[str, Any] = Field(
|
|
default_factory=dict,
|
|
description="The resolved value(s) if applicable",
|
|
)
|