feat: comprehensive docs, unit tests, docker-compose app services

- Add scheduler and ingestion unit tests (test_scheduler_unit.py, test_ingestion_unit.py)
- Add all 13 app services + dashboard to docker-compose.yml
- Add full documentation suite: API reference, Helm reference, Docker deployment guide,
  3 architecture diagrams (K8s, Docker Compose, data pipeline), AI agent guide,
  backup/restore guide, observability/metrics reference, per-service docs
- Add intelligence pipeline deep-dive docs with Mermaid diagrams
- Update README with documentation index and links
- Add specs for comprehensive-quality-docs, intelligence-pipeline-deep-dive,
  sanitized-pipeline-docs
This commit is contained in:
Celes Renata
2026-04-22 02:56:41 +00:00
parent f251c53f92
commit 88ad1e8d99
57 changed files with 13318 additions and 51 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
# Recommendation Generation Flow
```mermaid
flowchart TD
Q_REC["app:queue:recommendation"] -->|"lpop"| WORKER["Recommendation Worker\nservices/recommendation/main.py"]
WORKER --> FETCH["Fetch TrendSummary\nfrom trend_windows\nfor entity + window"]
FETCH --> SUPP
subgraph SUPP["Data Quality Suppression\nservices/recommendation/suppression.py"]
S1["extraction confidence < 0.40?"]
S2["evidence staleness > 168h?"]
S3["source diversity < 1 type?"]
S4["extraction failure rate > 50%?"]
S5["valid documents < 2?"]
S6["data quality score < 0.30?"]
S7["Macro-only signal?\nevaluate_macro_only_suppression()"]
S8["Pattern-only signal?\nevaluate_pattern_only_suppression()"]
end
SUPP -->|"Any check fails:\nsuppressed = true\nmode → informational"| ELIG
SUPP -->|"All checks pass"| ELIG
subgraph ELIG["Eligibility Evaluation\nservices/recommendation/eligibility.py"]
direction TB
G["Gate Checks"]
G1["confidence ≥ 0.35"]
G2["strength ≥ 0.10"]
G3["contradiction ≤ 0.60"]
G4["evidence ≥ 2"]
G5["direction ≠ neutral"]
G --> G1 & G2 & G3 & G4 & G5
G1 & G2 & G3 & G4 & G5 --> ACT["Action Mapping"]
ACT --> A1["ACT: positive + strength ≥ 0.25"]
ACT --> A2["DEFER: negative + strength ≥ 0.25"]
ACT --> A3["MONITOR: directional + confidence ≥ 0.50"]
ACT --> A4["OBSERVE: otherwise"]
A1 & A2 & A3 & A4 --> MODE["Mode Escalation"]
MODE --> M1["informational\n(default for MONITOR/OBSERVE)"]
MODE --> M2["simulation_eligible\nconfidence ≥ 0.50"]
MODE --> M3["production_eligible\nconfidence ≥ 0.70\ncontradiction ≤ 0.25\nevidence ≥ 5"]
end
ELIG --> SIZING
subgraph SIZING["Commitment Sizing\nservices/recommendation/eligibility.py"]
PS1["base = 1% allocation pool"]
PS2["scale by confidence × strength\nup to 10% max"]
PS3["contradiction penalty\n0.5 × contradiction_score"]
PS4["evidence count penalty\n< 3 docs → ×0.5\n< 5 docs → ×0.75"]
end
SIZING --> THESIS
subgraph THESIS["Thesis Generation"]
TH1["Deterministic thesis\nassembled from trend data"]
TH2["Optional LLM rewrite\nthesis-rewriter agent\nservices/recommendation/thesis_llm.py"]
TH1 --> TH2
end
THESIS --> RISK
subgraph RISK["Risk Classification"]
RC1["low"]
RC2["moderate"]
RC3["high"]
RC4["very_high"]
end
RISK --> PERSIST
subgraph PERSIST["Persistence — PostgreSQL"]
P1["recommendations"]
P2["recommendation_evidence"]
P3["risk_evaluations"]
end
```